PDA

View Full Version : Femme-M-A


Mandy
12-10-2008, 07:35 PM
I want to create a little logo/tag for this portion of the site, any thoughts???

Jessica_1979
12-10-2008, 10:30 PM
That's a great idea! I'll think about it!

ATT
12-10-2008, 10:37 PM
I can modify a hooters logo and put Femme-M-A on it. Thats for my girls here. You know who you are:D

Lisa
12-11-2008, 01:20 AM
ha ha make us something cool guys!!! you know what's up ATT, you are one of us, you even said that yourself. You can think of something cute I'm sure.

ama6730
12-11-2008, 08:38 AM
Lisa, yet another nick name is in order...

ATT "The boob man"

Leave it up to him and the logo will be a big ol picture of some bouncy cha cha's haha Sounds good to me.

ATT: you need to check out my new picture to caption. I think you'll be proud of me. I thought of you when I posted it!

Jessica_1979
12-11-2008, 08:48 AM
ATT

"A Ta Tas"
:p

Lisa
12-11-2008, 09:42 AM
That is hilarious Jess!!!!! Love that!!!!!

Lisa
12-11-2008, 09:44 AM
Always
Talkin'
Titties


i think that is what ATT really stands for. :)

ama6730
12-11-2008, 10:28 AM
I like that one lisa!:p

werudt9g4u
10-08-2010, 07:44 PM
The EHRC said: "The commission asked whether, in its current form, the guidance does enough to protect officers in the field because it may leave them with the erroneous expectation that they will be protected from personal criminal liability in situations where they may,Tackett says. &quot (http://wb4b.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3845),ugg purses (http://www.boots4usa.com), unwittingly, be liable for crimes committed and condoned by others."
The commission's legal director John Wadham said: "The government now has the opportunity to bring its guidance within the law so that the intelligence service itself and its individual officers do not unwittingly leave themselves open to costly and time-consuming court action."
In his letter,tall ugg boots (http://www.boots4usa.com), Mr Wadham,discount ugg boots (http://www.boots4usa.com), who also wrote to other government ministers, argues the guidance incorrectly suggests the principles are consistent with domestic and international law obligations, including the UN Convention Against Torture.